Original Metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Title | Sister Johnson wearing a robe, holding an open book in one hand, with her other hand pointing upwards |
| Description | Recto: Penn. Studio, 903 Pennsylvania Ave., Baltimore, Md.; Verso: Sister Johnson, 903 Philadelphia Ave., Baltimore, Md., 1861, Jun. 1860, 903 Pennsylvania, Baltimore, Md., Penn. Studio, Penn. Studio, Jun. 1860, 903 Pennsylvania Ave., Baltimore, Md. |
| Creator | Penn Studio. |
| Date of creation | 1860-06 |
| Subject / names | Johnson. |
| Subject / geolocation | Baltimore (Md.) |
| Subject / topics | Robes. |
Criteria
Completeness
GPT-3.5 Turbo
Score: 4
Feedback: The metadata provides good detail about Sister Johnson, the subject of the photograph, including her name, what she is wearing, and what she is doing. However, the lack of information on her background or the context of the photograph creates minor imbalances in the description. Adding details about her significance or the purpose of the photo would help provide a more comprehensive understanding. The metadata focuses more on the studio and location than on Sister Johnson herself, resulting in a slight imbalance.
GPT-4o Mini
Score: 3
Feedback: The metadata primarily focuses on Sister Johnson, indicating her role and identity, which is a positive aspect. However, it lacks broader contextual information about her and the significance of her attire, reducing understanding of her influence. Additionally, it could encompass more about the collective experiences of African American women rather than solely one individual.
Command R+
Score: 3
Feedback: The metadata for this item presents a moderately comprehensive description of the photograph, capturing essential details such as the subject’s name, attire, and posture. However, there are gaps and imbalances that impact the inclusivity of the description. While the title mentions “Sister Johnson,” it does not provide her first name, which could be an important aspect of her identity. The use of the title “Sister” without further context may imply a religious affiliation, but it is unclear if this is accurate or respectful without additional information.
Furthermore, the description “wearing a robe” is vague and could be expanded upon to provide a more inclusive and accurate representation of the subject’s attire. Is it a religious habit, a ceremonial garment, or simply a personal fashion choice? More detail would help convey a more nuanced understanding of the photograph.
Lastly, the absence of contextual information about Sister Johnson’s life, experiences, and relationship to the photographer or studio could contribute to an imbalance in the representation of her identity. Additional details could enhance the depth and inclusivity of the description, providing a more holistic understanding of the subject and her story.
Timeliness
GPT-3.5 Turbo
Score: 4
Feedback: The term “Negro” appears to be missing from this metadata record, which is a positive sign, as it is a term that carries historical negative connotations and is no longer considered appropriate. However, the term “African American women” is used, which is generally accepted as a more inclusive and respectful way to refer to Black women in the United States. “Robes” and “Johnson” are neutral terms. Overall, the language used in this metadata is fairly modern and respectful, with only minimal instances of potentially harmful language.
GPT-4o Mini
Score: 5
Feedback: The metadata for this photograph appears to use neutral terms that do not carry harmful connotations or perpetuate negative stereotypes. The description focuses on the subject’s attire and location without employing outdated or derogatory language. Overall, it maintains respect for the individual’s identity and context, aligning well with contemporary inclusive standards in archival practice.
Command R+
Score: 4
Feedback: The metadata for this item from the Robert Langmuir African American Photograph Collection contains minimal instances of harmful language. The term “Sister” in the title and description might be considered outdated, but it is not inherently harmful and could be contextual to the subject’s life or the time period. The usage of “African American women” in the “Topics” field is appropriate and indicative of inclusive language. However, the singular usage of “Johnson” in the “Subjects” field without a title or last name could be seen as a minor oversight. The use of a full name or a title with the last name would have been more respectful and formal. Overall, the language used in these metadata is mostly respectful and does not contain severe instances of harmful or outdated terminology.
Accessibility
GPT-3.5 Turbo
Score: 4
Feedback: The metadata is mostly accessible as it provides detailed information about the photograph in a clear and straightforward manner. The title describes the image, the abstract includes key details such as the studio name, location, dates, and subject’s name. The use of abbreviations like ‘Md.’ for Maryland may slightly hinder understandability for some users but overall the metadata effectively conveys relevant information about the photograph.
GPT-4o Mini
Score: 3
Feedback: The metadata includes jargon such as “Recto” and “Verso,” which may confuse users unfamiliar with photographic terminology. The use of specific addresses and studio references also complicates understandability. While it provides essential details about the photograph, simplifying language and reducing redundancy would enhance accessibility for broader audiences. Overall, it partially meets archival descriptive standards.
Command R+
Score: 4
Feedback: The metadata for this item from the Robert Langmuir African American Photograph Collection is largely written in clear and plain language, with a concise title and abstract providing key details about the photograph. The use of the phrase “Sister Johnson” in the title and the subject field may require additional context for some users but is clear and not obstructed by jargon or complex sentence structure. The date and location are also presented in a standard and understandable format. The only acronym/abbreviation present is “Md.” for Maryland, which is a standard abbreviation and likely understandable in this context. The score of 4.0 takes into account the potential for improved context and the presence of a minor abbreviation. Overall, the metadata is largely accessible and provides a clear description of the item.